Cookie tracking notice
Are we allowed to crumble with cookies and anonymous tracking?

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site (so called session cookies), while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). We use the application Matomo and the external service etracker to analyze your behavior on our website anonymously. Because we value your privacy, we are here with asking your permission to use the following technologies. You can change your settings any time via this link or the menu item in footer menu. For more information visit our Data Policy

Faecal Sludge Management for Disaster Relief - Technology Comparison Study

Arup and Oxfam (2019)

Published in: 2019
Pages: 51

Arup and Oxfam

Arup and Oxfam

Uploaded by:
SuSanA Admin

Partner profile:
common upload


 Location of library entry

On behalf of Oxfam, Arup have conducted a technical comparison study on Faecal Sludge Management at the Rohingya camps close to Cox's Bazar (CXB), Bangladesh. The aim of the study is to draw conclusions on best practice FSM for disaster relief, from evidence gathered through practical experience. The study used existing available data to inform the analysis and in many cases these datasets are limited. The findings from the report should therefore be treated as provisional and are relevant to the particular context of the situation at CXB.

Over 20 operational FSM sites were visited in CXB, constructed by eight different NGOs and using eight different technologies. The eight FSM technologies were:

1. Constructed Wetlands
2. GeoTubes
3. Lime (Three main types; lagoons, in barrel and three tanks)
4. Anaerobic Lagoons
5. Aerobic Treatment
6. Upflow Filters (Two main types; with and without pre-settlement)
7. Biogas
8. Anaerobic Baffled Reactors (ABR)

The FSM technologies were compared against a set of indicators including; cost, footprint area, speed of construction and commissioning, operation and maintenance issues, pathogen inactivation and resilience to natural disasters.

A scoring of 1 (most effective) to 5 (less effective) has been given to each
technology for each indicator. For longer term i.e over 2 years, decentralised
FSM technology, the Upflow Filters score well against a number of the key
indicators and are therefore considered an effective ‘all round’ FSM technology.
The Aerobic Treatment and Anerobic Lagoons scored similar for centralised
treatment. The lagoons scored slightly better as the technology is simpler
operate and maintain. Although these technologies have the lowest/best
scoring they still have limitations and selection should be informed by site

It is considered that in the immediate phase of an emergency Lime treatment is
still the appropriate FSM technology choice due to its speed of set up, stability
of the treatment process and effluent quality. However due to the high OPEX of
Lime it is not appropriate to use it as a longer-term solution i.e. after one or two

This report was commissioned by Oxfam GB
and was delivered in partnership with Arup.
On behalf of the study team, we would like
to thank many people for supporting this
project including those from the following
organisations; Oxfam Bangladesh, United
Nations High Commission for Refugees,
International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies, WaterAid, Practical Action,
NGO Forum, UPM, International Organisation
for Migration, UNICEF, BRAC, Solidarités
International and BORDA.
The project team included Justin Abbott
(Arup), Salahuddin Ahmmed (Oxfam), Mana
Bala (Oxfam), Andy Bastable (Oxfam), Eleanor
Earl (Arup), Tim Forster (Oxfam), Anna Grieve
(Arup), Hamish Hay (Arup), Inigo Ruiz-Apilanez
(Arup) and Roman Svidran (Arup).

Bibliographic information

Arup and Oxfam (2019). Faecal Sludge Management for Disaster Relief - Technology Comparison Study. Arup and Oxfam

Filter tags

East Asia & Pacific English Faecal sludge treatment processes


Faecal Sludge Management for Disaster Relief

Format: pdf file
Size: 5.46 MB

Share this page on    

Follow us on    

SuSanA Partners  currently 400 partners

Networks Circle


Latest SuSanA Blog Articles

  • 26-03-2024Alice Brandt ,Mascha Kaddori:
    Let’s get wild: Water, sanitation and hygiene at the human-wildlife interface »
  • 21-03-2024Tabeer Riaz:
    Empowering Young Women Water Professionals in South Asia: Leading the Wave of Change »
  • 12-03-2024Beauty Mkoba:
    Unlocking the potential of African Women in STEM through mentorship »
  • 08-03-2024Gloria Mariga :
    Mentorship empowers African women to lead environmental stewardship »
  • 05-03-2024Josphine Gaicugi:
    Achieving access to adequate and equitable sanitation for all is no mean feat »
  • 01-02-2024Sanitation for Millions:
    Toilets Making the Grade® school competition – A Competition where all Participants are Winners »
  • 24-01-2024Anne Fetscher,Jörg Felmeden:
    The sustainable use of tap water (in Germany) and the power of education. An Interview with Dr.-Ing. Jörg Felmeden »

SuSanA Blog »

SuSanA newsletter

Stay informed about the activities of SuSanA and its partners. The SuSanA newsletter is sent out around four times per year. It contains information about news, events, new partners, projects, discussions and publications of the SuSanA network.

Subscribe to newsletter »




Resources and publications

Our library has more than 3,000 publications, factsheets, presentations, drawings etc. from many different organisations. It continues to grow thanks to the contributions from our partners.

Add item to library »

The three links below take you to special groups of items in the library for more convenient access:


The project database contains nearly 400 sanitation projects of many different organizations dealing with research, implementation, advocacy, capacity development etc. Advanced filtering functions and a global map are also available. Information on how and why this database was created is here.

People working for SuSanA partners can add their own projects through their partner profile page. You might need your SuSanA login upgraded for this purpose. Please contact us if you would like to add a project.

Trainings, conference and events materials

Missed important conferences or courses? Catch up by using their materials for self study. These materials have been kindly provided by SuSanA partners.

Shit flow diagrams, excreta flow diagrams (304 SFDs worldwide)

Shit flow diagrams (SFDs) help to visualize excreta management in urban settings. Access SFDs and more through the SFD Portal.

Emersan eCompendium

Humanitarian Sanitation Hub

Sanitation Workers Knowledge and Learning Hub




Discussion forum

Share knowledge, exchange experiences, discuss challenges, make announcements, ask questions and more. Hint: Your discussion forum login is the same as your SuSanA login. More about the forum's philosophy »

Integrated content

We are hosting content from some other communities of practice and information-sharing portals. This section also provides a link to SuSanA's Sanitation Wikipedia initiative.

Suggest content to add »

SuSanA partners

Not yet a SuSanA partner? Show your organisation's support to SuSanA's vision and engage in  knowledge sharing by becoming partners.

Apply to become a partner »

Individual membership

Register as an individual member of SuSanA free of charge. As a member you can interact with thousands of sanitation enthusiasts on the discussion forum.  You can also get engaged in one of our 13 working groups and our regional chapters. Our FAQs explain the benefits further.

By getting a SuSanA login you can fully participate in the SuSanA community!

Register as a member


Forgot your password?
Forgot your username?